The Music Metadata Checklist: What to Confirm Before Every Release
A song may begin with inspiration, but getting it properly credited and paid requires accurate information.

Before a release reaches streaming platforms, important decisions have already been made: who wrote the song, who owns the recording, how the ownership is divided, and who is responsible for registering and administering each right.
If those decisions are not documented clearly, even a successful release can create royalty problems later.
Incorrect or incomplete metadata can make it harder to connect a recording to its underlying composition, identify the appropriate rightsholders, and distribute royalties accurately. A simple pre-release review can prevent months—or even years—of corrections.
Use this music metadata checklist before every release.
1. Confirm the final song title
Use the same title everywhere the song appears, including your:
Distributor submission
Split sheet
Performing rights organization registration
Publisher or administrator records
Mechanical royalty registrations
Internal catalog or royalty system
Small variations can create unnecessary confusion. Check spelling, capitalization, punctuation, abbreviations, and spacing.
If the recording is an alternate version, identify it consistently. Examples include:
Radio Edit
Live Version
Acoustic Version
Remix
Instrumental
Remastered Version
Do not add a version description in one system and omit it everywhere else without documenting the relationship between the recordings.
2. Document every songwriter
Record the full legal name and professional name of every songwriter who contributed to the composition.
For each writer, confirm:
Full legal name
Professional or stage name
Email address
Performing rights organization affiliation
IPI or CAE number
Publisher or administrator, if applicable
Do not rely on memory, text messages, or an informal conversation after the release. Collect this information while the details are still fresh.
3. Finalize the ownership splits
The composition splits should reflect the percentage owned by each songwriter or publisher.
Before release, confirm that:
Every contributor agrees to the splits
The total equals 100%
The agreed percentages are documented
Each writer understands whether their share is self-administered or represented by a publisher
All parties retain a copy of the final agreement
A signed split sheet provides a clear reference if questions arise later. It can also help prevent conflicting registrations from being submitted by different parties.
4. Identify the publishers and administrators
A songwriter, publisher, and publishing administrator can play different roles.
For every composition owner, determine:
Whether the writer is self-administered
Whether a publisher controls the share
Whether a third-party administrator manages registrations or collections
The effective dates and territories covered by any agreement
Who is responsible for registering the composition
Do not assume another collaborator, manager, label, distributor, or publisher will complete a registration. Assign responsibility clearly.
5. Confirm the performing artist information
Document how the primary and featured artists should appear on the release.
Check:
Primary artist name
Featured artist names
Consistent spelling and formatting
Existing artist profiles on streaming platforms
Whether the release should connect to a new or existing profile
Artist naming errors may not directly change composition ownership, but they can cause recordings to appear on the wrong profile and create additional cleanup work.
6. Confirm who owns the sound recording
Identify the individual or company that owns the master recording.
Record:
Master owner’s legal name
Label name, if applicable
Ownership percentages if there are multiple owners
Applicable territories
Effective dates
Any licensing or distribution arrangements
The owner of the sound recording is not necessarily the owner of the underlying composition. Both sides must be documented separately.
7. Assign the correct ISRC
An International Standard Recording Code, or ISRC, identifies a specific sound recording.
Each distinct recording should generally have its own ISRC. For example, a studio recording, live recording, remix, and acoustic version are separate recordings and should not all reuse the same code.
Confirm that:
Every recording has the correct ISRC
The same ISRC is delivered consistently to each platform
An existing recording is not accidentally assigned a new ISRC
A new or materially different recording is not assigned the code belonging to another version
Keep the ISRC in your internal catalog records along with the title, artist, and master owner.
8. Record the composition identifier
An International Standard Musical Work Code, or ISWC, identifies the composition rather than the recording.
An ISWC may not be available before the initial release because it is generally assigned after the composition is registered. If one has already been assigned, retain it in your catalog and make sure it is associated with the correct composition.
Do not confuse the ISWC with the ISRC:
ISWC: identifies the written composition
ISRC: identifies a specific sound recording
One composition can be connected to multiple recordings and therefore multiple ISRCs.
9. Confirm the release information
Review the information that identifies the overall release, including:
Release title
Release date
Label name
UPC or EAN
Track sequence
Genre
Language
Explicit-content designation
Territory restrictions, if any
Copyright notices
Confirm the appropriate ℗ notice for the sound recording and © notice for the applicable release materials.
10. Review producer, performer, and contributor credits
Capture complete credits for everyone who contributed to the recording.
Depending on the release, this may include:
Producers
Featured performers
Session musicians
Vocalists
Engineers
Mixers
Remixers
Arrangers
Clearly distinguish creative credit from copyright ownership. A contributor may receive a credit, a fee, royalty participation, copyright ownership, or a combination of these—but those rights should be based on the applicable agreement, not assumed from the credit alone.
11. Address samples and interpolations
If the song contains a sample or incorporates part of another composition, confirm that the necessary rights and approvals have been addressed before release.
Document:
The sampled recording
The underlying sampled composition
The applicable rightsholders
Approval status
Agreed ownership or royalty terms
Any credit requirements
An interpolation recreates part of an existing composition without using the original sound recording. It may still require permission relating to the composition.
Because clearance requirements can be fact-specific, consult a qualified music attorney when necessary.
12. Decide who will complete each registration
A complete metadata file is only useful if the information reaches the organizations that need it.
Create a simple responsibility list identifying who will handle:
Distribution delivery
Performing rights organization registration
Mechanical royalty registration
Publisher or administrator delivery
Sound recording performance registrations, when applicable
Neighboring-rights registrations, when applicable
Internal catalog maintenance
Ongoing statement reconciliation
Include a due date and completion status for each task.
Your final pre-release check
Before approving delivery, ask:
Is the song title final and consistent?
Have all writers been identified?-- Do the composition splits equal 100%?
Are writer affiliations and IPI numbers correct?
Is publishing and administration responsibility clear?
Is the master owner documented?
Does each recording have the correct ISRC?
Are artist names and contributor credits accurate?
Have samples or interpolations been addressed?
Does everyone know which registrations they must complete?
Is there one reliable place where the final information is stored?
If any answer is “I don’t know,” pause and investigate before the release goes live.
Metadata management continues after release
Release day is not the end of the process.
After release, confirm that the music appears on the correct artist profiles, registrations have been accepted, recording and composition information is connected where applicable, and the expected royalty statements begin arriving.
Catalog information should also be reviewed when:
Ownership changes
A publishing or administration agreement begins or ends
A corrected or alternate recording is released
A title or credit is updated
Conflicting claims appear
Expected payments decline or fail to arrive
Strong metadata does more than organize a catalog. It supports accurate royalty processing, clearer reporting, better relationships, and fewer problems as a music business grows.
Tsila Rights helps creators and music companies build clear, reliable rights and royalty workflows. If you need help reviewing your metadata, registrations, or release process, contact us at hello@tsilarights.com.

Comments